Worked example · updated 2026-08-03
Claiming at 62 Against Waiting Until 70
A hypothetical retiree born in 1962 has a benefit of $2,400 a month at full retirement age. Claiming at 62 starts the money eight years sooner and permanently smaller; waiting until 70 does the reverse. Here is where the two cross, and what that crossing point does not tell anyone.
Illustrative worked example. The household is hypothetical; every figure is computed by the same verified engines and rule packs the calculators use.
The situation
A hypothetical retiree born in 1962, whose Social Security statement shows $2,400 a month at full retirement age. They are weighing the two ends of the range: claim at 62 and accept a permanently reduced benefit that starts eight years earlier, or wait until 70 and take the delayed retirement credits. The comparison below is plain cumulative dollars, projected through age 95, with no inflation assumption and no discount rate. Both of those omissions are deliberate and both are explained in the walkthrough.
What goes in
- Benefit at full retirement age
- $2,400
- Birth year
- 1962
- Cost-of-living assumption
- None — today's dollars
- Projected through age
- 95
What comes out
Age at which waiting to 70 has paid back the years of missed checks
80 years 4 months
in plain cumulative dollars, with no inflation assumption
- Monthly benefit claiming at 62
- $1,680 a month
- Monthly benefit claiming at 70
- $2,976 a month
- Total received by 85, claiming at 62
- $465,360
- Total received by 85, waiting to 70$73,296 ahead by that age
- $538,656
Verified 2026-08-02 against SSA — Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Information for 2026 (effective 2026-01-01)
What the break-even age actually measures
It measures one thing: the age at which the total dollars received from the later claim overtake the total from the earlier one. Before that age the person who claimed early is ahead in cumulative terms, and after it the person who waited is. That is a real and useful fact, and it is also a narrower fact than the weight usually placed on it. It answers a question about arithmetic, not a question about whether waiting was the right decision for a particular household.
Why there is no inflation assumption and no discount rate here
Cost-of-living increases apply to both claiming ages, so including them moves the crossing point only slightly while making every figure harder to check against a statement. A discount rate would be the more sophisticated treatment, and tools like Open Social Security do it well, but expressing an answer as a present value at an assumed real rate asks the reader to hold a concept they should not have to hold in order to decide when to claim. Plain cumulative dollars can be verified with a calculator. That is the trade being made, stated rather than hidden.
What break-even does not tell you
Four things, none of them small. It does not know how long anyone will live, which is the input the whole comparison turns on. It ignores that the larger benefit is what a surviving spouse keeps, so for a married couple the higher earner's decision outlives them both. It says nothing about whether claiming early means leaving invested money alone, or about a household that simply needs the income at 62 and has no choice to weigh. And it treats a dollar at 63 and a dollar at 85 as equal, which no household does.
How to use the crossing point without over-reading it
Treat it as one input among several rather than as the answer. If the break-even age sits well beyond a realistic life expectancy, that is a real argument for claiming earlier. If it sits comfortably inside one, and there is a spouse whose survivor benefit depends on the larger figure, that is a real argument the other way. And if the household needs the money now, the comparison is educational rather than actionable, which is worth saying plainly instead of implying that everyone has a free choice here.
What this example is good for
The break-even age is a fact about arithmetic, not a recommendation. It is most useful when it lands far from a plausible life expectancy, and least useful when it lands near one — because that is exactly when the factors it leaves out, longevity and the survivor's floor, decide the question instead.
Run this with your own numbers — Break-even
Enter the benefit printed on your own Social Security statement and see the age at which claiming later overtakes claiming earlier, in plain cumulative dollars and again weighted by the chance of living to collect. This is an estimate, and the panel beside it names the four things a break-even age cannot tell you.
Calculators behind this example
Break-even
Enter the benefit printed on your own Social Security statement and see the age at which claiming later overtakes claiming earlier, in plain cumulative dollars and again weighted by the chance of living to collect. This is an estimate, and the panel beside it names the four things a break-even age cannot tell you.
62 vs 67 vs 70
See what claiming at 62, at your full retirement age, and at 70 would pay each month and each year, worked from the benefit figure on your own Social Security statement. Includes the break-even math between any two of them, and an honest account of what that break-even age leaves out. Estimate only.
Survivor benefits
When one spouse dies, the survivor keeps the larger of the two Social Security benefits, not both. Enter what each of you receives to see the household income that would remain, the monthly drop in each case, and how the higher earner's claiming age sets the survivor's floor for life. Estimate only.
Estimate only — not financial, tax, legal, or insurance advice. Only SSA can determine your actual amounts.
Official source: SSA — Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Information for 2026 ↗
Works offline — your inputs never leave this device. How that works
Annual update alerts — new tax and benefit figures the week they drop
One email when the numbers change. Double opt-in, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.